|
West/Central (U.S. 34)
Corridor Plan

West/Central (U.S.34) Corridor 

Existing Land Use: This segment of U.S.
Hwy 34 (Eisenhower Blvd.) extends from roughly the Greeley Loveland
Canal to the western limit of the City’s Growth Management Area (GMA).
The U.S. 34 corridor as a whole is the community’s primary business
thoroughfare. It is also Loveland’s front door to visitors on their way
to destinations in the mountains. The future redevelopment and
enhancement of this corridor will be central to the City’s ability to
sustain the viability of many of its older neighborhoods and capture a
greater share of the potential tourism market.
The predominant land use along the road frontage is
strip commercial, a pattern that characterizes much of Loveland’s older
corridors. Many parcels are shallow and lack landscaping, architectural
quality and amenities found at the eastern end of the corridor in the
newly developing regional commercial center near the I-25 interchange.
While most sites are shallow commercial parcels,
several major retailers are located along the corridor, including Sam’s
Club, Home Depot and K-mart. Additionally, the corridor is home to
Group Publishing, a growing primary employer, as well as a number of
medical, real estate and professional offices.
West of Wilson Avenue, the intensity of commercial
use decreases and the corridor has characteristics of a more rural
commercial strip and much of this area remains under County
jurisdiction. There are more vacant and underutilized sites and most of
the corridor has not been annexed. This end of the corridor is anchored
by the site of Group Publishing, situated on an attractive campus-style
office site. Behind the frontage, the entire corridor is extensively
developed with a wide variety of residential uses of all types. These
include many of Loveland’s older neighborhoods with modest housing, as
well as a number of multi-family apartments.
Utilities: Most of the corridor is
developed with a full complement of urban services and utilities.
Improvements and upgrades to utilities may be necessary as redevelopment
and infill occurs. The western end of the corridor is served with water
by the City of Loveland. Sanitary sewer service has not been extended
west of Morning Drive.
Road Network: The primary and secondary
road network is in-place and no new collector or arterial roads are
planned in this area of the City. Recent improvements were made to
widen a segment of U.S. 34 east of U.S. 287 to eliminate a bottleneck
and provide managed center turning lane movements. The second phase of
improvements to widen N. Taft Avenue calls for intersection improvements
at U.S. 34 and changes to site access in the vicinity of Taft. This
improvement is currently budgeted by the City. The City’s 2030
Transportation Plan calls for U.S. 34 to have six through lanes to U.S.
287 and four lanes from that point west. Future intersection
improvements are also planned at Madison Ave., U.S. 287, and Wilson
Boulevard.
CDOT is currently conducting an environmental
assessment that includes a segment of this corridor east of U.S. 287.
According to CDOT: “The purpose of the project is to provide an
improved transportation corridor in northern Colorado, between US 287
and LCR 3, which would meet the following needs: (1) relieve current and
future traffic congestion, (2) improve local and regional access, (3)
improve transportation safety, and (4) support approved economic
development for this portion of US 34.
(Link
to CDOT Project Website) CDOT is proposing
widening the study area to three lanes, with bicycle lanes and
sidewalks, using context sensitive solutions; and better controlling
access by having fewer access points and having all new access points
comply with the State Highway Access Code.
Due to heavy traffic volumes on U.S. 34, sections
of the corridor are constrained by the City’s Adequate Community
Facility Standards. Infill and redevelopment activity, especially in
the vicinity of Taft Avenue and Wilson Avenue, is constrained by
requirements to meet the City’s ACF standards.
Environmental: The eastern end of the
corridor does not include any natural area designations. The western
endof the corridor in the vicinity of Rossum Drive includes portions of
several natural areas, including Namaqua Ridge and natural areas
associated with the Big Thompson River. U.S. 34 also crosses the City’s
loop recreational trail and open lands purchased for trail
right-of-way.

The corridor features several significant view
amenities. These include the southern shore of Lake Loveland and vista
of the foothills and Mummy Range to the west. The western end of the
corridor is also the gateway to scenic landforms including Namaqua
Ridge, and Devils Backbone and entrance to the Big Thompson Canyon
outside the City’s GMA.
Development Activity: Home Depot, opened in
2003, has been the only major retail addition in recent years. The
110,000-square foot Shopko department store adjacent to Home Depot was
vacated in 2005 and is currently undergoing re-occupancy. A ten-acre
meeting and hotel complex has been proposed on vacant land near the
Group Publishing site. Other smaller office and retail buildings have
been built over the past five years.
Future Land Use Plan: With a few
exceptions, the frontage of U.S. 34 is designated CC-Corridor
Commercial. This designation reflects the established strip commercial
land use pattern which is unlikely to change. Beyond the frontage,
designations range from E-Employment, I-Industrial, and HDR-High Density
Residential at the eastern end in the vicinity of the site of the former
Sugar Factory, to MDR-Medium Density Residential and LDR-Low Density
Residential in most other areas. Several of these land use designations
are considered mixed-use categories and provide flexibility consistent
with the need to encourage development and redevelopment. This land use
framework should be adequate as the corridor changes and improves over
time.
City of Loveland Comprehensive/
Land Use Plan
Section 4.4 Analysis of
Major Corridors and Redevelopment Opportunities
Section 4.4 of the Comprehensive /Land Use Plan
highlights major highway corridors and the downtown and its surrounding
neighborhoods. Each subsection provides a brief description of the
area, likely significant development constraints and opportunities, and
a set of recommended action steps. These areas have been selected for
more detailed analysis for several reasons.
·
Corridors, because of their visibility and role as a focus
of commerce, have a significant impact on the image, appearance and
future economic vitality of the City.
·
Many of the City’s older commercial corridors are
characterized by strip commercial development which suffers from
obsolescence and is at risk of decline as new, higher quality, and more
competitive commercial centers emerge at the edges of the City.
·
Recent successful redevelopment projects in the downtown
have created the first real opportunity to achieve the long sought after
goal of a revitalized downtown. Encouraging and guiding a “second tier”
redevelopment effort will be a crucial step toward achieving this
ultimate goal.
Previous Corridor Plans
Major arterial corridors have long been a priority
in sub-area planning efforts undertaken by the City. As a consideration
in the following sections, below is a status evaluation of the City’s
existing corridor plans. Also included below is an assessment of the
City architectural and redevelopment standards since these can play an
important role in the future redevelopment of commercial corridors. In
summary, most corridor plans are limited in scope and do not reflect the
level of recent commercial development activity along most of the City’s
corridors. Architectural standards are typically limited in scope to a
specific developments or districts, or are aimed at only new
construction and do not have broad applicability to redevelopment
proposals.
·
U.S. Highway 34 Corridor Study, 1993: This
plan includes design guidelines applicable to the eastern portion of the
Hwy. U.S. 34 corridor from Boise Ave. to I-25. The design guidelines
stress preservation of mountain views and elements of the streetscape.
These guidelines do not extend to portions of the corridor west of Boise
Avenue nor do they address redevelopment issues common to the western
portions of this corridor. Also, these guidelines are outdated because
philosophies regarding the character of the corridor are not consistent
with the level of recent development activity. For example, these
guidelines do not reflect extensive new commercial, office and
residential development within the Millennium project (see comments
below).
·
Major Arterial Corridors Design Guidelines, 1997:
This document establishes design guidelines for the US 34, State
Hwy. 402, U.S. 287, Taft and Wilson Avenue corridors. Guidelines address
urban, suburban and rural design characteristics and address both
architecture and site design issues. These guidelines are also out of
date in that “rural” zones are established at the outer extents of the
corridors that do not reflect recent significant developments in these
areas. “Rural” zones designated by the plan include the northern portion
of the U.S. 287 corridor and the eastern portion of the U.S. 34 corridor
that have also seen extensive development activity in recent years and
are no longer “rural” in character.
·
I-25 Corridor Plan, 2001: The I-25 Corridor
Plan was adopted to guide transportation improvements in the interstate
corridor that extends from south of Johnstown to north of Fort Collins.
This regional plan addresses the entire northern Colorado extent of the
I-25 corridor. The plan was adopted by the City of Loveland in 2001 as
well as by most major northern Colorado Communities. Design guidelines
that accompanied the plan were not adopted by Loveland. The City
primarily relies on design guidelines within the Millennium project that
encompasses much of the I-25 area within the City and newly adopted
architectural guidelines as part of the Zoning Code.
·
Architectural and Design Standards:
Many newer commercial developments in the City have been approved as
planned developments with architectural standards, the most notable
being the Millennium development at U.S. 34 and I-25. The City recently
adopted Commercial and Industrial Architectural standards as part of the
Zoning Code. However, these standards apply to newly constructed
buildings and do not apply to existing development sites unless new
construction is proposed, or existing buildings are substantially
expanded. The only area of the city currently covered by redevelopment
design guidelines is the Be-Established Business District, which covers
only the core downtown area. Further, there are few design standards
that apply to residential development and none that are tailored to
infill development in existing neighborhoods, outside of the
Be-Established Business district.
·
East / West Mobility Study, 1997: This plan
focused on traffic volume issues associated with east/ west mobility.
East / west mobility is constrained in Loveland due to natural features,
such as Boyd Lake and Lake Loveland that create barriers to east / west
movement in the community, and existing inadequacies in the east / west
transportation system. It included recommendations for several east /
west arterials including Eisenhower Boulevard. Recommendations for
Eisenhower Boulevard focused on travel lane and intersection
improvements. Intersection improvements were recommended at Wilson,
Taft, Madison and Cleveland/Lincoln Avenues. This study did not address
aesthetics or issues associated with redevelopment or infill development
of land along the corridor.
·
Tentative West Central US 34 Corridor Timeline:
Oct-Dec
08 Data Collection, Comparative Project Analysis
Feb – Mar 09 Public “Kick Off” Meeting
Mar-Apr 09 Joint
Planning Commission and City Council Work Session, Visioning
Dec-Feb 09 Analyze Corridor and Market
Conditions
Mar-May 09 Public Outreach (Visioning,
Goals and Objectives)
Jun 09 Joint Planning
Commission and City Council Work Session, (Visioning, Goals and
Objectives)
Jul 09 Staff prepares Draft
Design Study, Guidelines and Overlay Zone Recommendations
Aug 09 Joint
Planning Commission and City Council Work Session, Draft
Sep 09 Public Outreach –
Presentation of Draft
Oct-Nov 09 Staff prepares Final Draft
Design Study, Guidelines and Overlay Zone Recommendations, (including
implementation strategies (“toolbox”) and funding estimates and options)
Oct-Nov 09 Joint
Planning Commission and City Council Work Session, Final Draft
Dec 09 Council Adopts Design Study, Guidelines and Overlay Zone Regulations
Back to Top |